THE HAND OF GOD
IN
THE TIME TRAVELER'S UNIVERSE
Page 2
By
Daniel W. Merrick
Inertia is to weak to continue this expansion with out a mega-gravity
force pulling the universe outward. When it comes down to it that is what
most cosmologists are depending on. That inertia will slow , the expansion
will slow, and that the big crunch will land on all existence in a few
Billion Trillion to some power years. With that model there is no God and
no consequences for mans actions. No definitive infinity would have no
laws of structure. No laws of structure and you have no definitive values
of physics. Thus Stephen Hawking writes "the uncertainty principle places
limitations on the accuracy of all of our predictions". Actually the uncertainty
principle, as with infinite numbers, proves the existence of an infinite
creator that forced it all into being. The uncertainty is the infinite
value that an infinite creator left as a clue to his existence. For that
cause, one can never know the exact size of the infinite universe because
once it's measurement is calculated at any finite point of
expansion, you must always add the factor of it's expansion in the
time it took you to calculate it's size. In this way to calculate the size
of the universe is an infinite task constantly needing correction. What
the E- plain does is just as Stephen Hawking writes, "what the singularity
theorems really indicate is that the gravitational field becomes so strong
that quantum gravitational effects become important: classical theory is
no longer a good description of the universe....There need not be any singularities
in the quantum theory".
But also the opposite is true in that our universe has it's own singularity.
What I mean to say is that the finite matter and energy in the expanding
universe is balanced with all the matter it can contain and maintain expansion.
This universe may not lend matter or energy with out gaining matter and
energy from some other universe to maintain that balance.
If figure 1:2 is the case then the energy exchange happened in the past
and is connected to the present sharing of parallel universes matter and
energy. E would still = MC squared but as follows: E1=M1 C12 , E2=M2 C22
, and the same for universe 3 as E3=M3 C32. The formula for the E-plain
would have to be able to maintain the C of the constant in all three universes.
E-plain Energy and Matter would have to be constantly increasing only if
matter in the universe was increasing matter an energy. With E and M constant
then the gravitational pull of expansion would never stop. As matter moved
farther apart the gravity of the E-plain would move outward ahead of it.
Since the matter of the black Holes in the universe are so strong and dense,
their fall would never be greater than all the energy and matter in the
universe. I suspect that there is maintained just enough to keep things
expanding at a constant rate with out much slow down once the balance of
inertia is in place being feed by the black holes that are newly created
from supernovas. The E-plain would also explain how new stars are able
to be born. The gravity of the E-plain would force matter and gases together
at some point of expansion and transfer the energy required to make a new
star. Gravity now becomes a constant in the universe also. But in two parts,
internal gravity and external gravity. You certainly can not take something
away from one side of the equation and not add it to the other. It is elementary
algebra and Uncle Albert's constant.
In figure 1:1 we see time in 3 dimensions being Forward, Width, and Depth.
Time past is not drawn into this figure but would be a reverse arrow moving
toward creation. Recent theory predicts that superstrings can be utilized
to travel back in time. But to do so you must escape the effect of the
3 dimensional aspects of time in the event horizon of now. The E-plain
has its own time and is the vortex to the past that allows superstirngs
to connect us to the past. If we could use a monopole superconductor as
an attractor to tune into the energy frequency of the superstring then
perhaps we could use the magnetic field of the E-plains gravitational force
to
pull us into the past at the speed of light. Perhaps these strings of energy
can be mapped at given equal values and traveled upon through the universe
that would make light speed achievable by using the map to avoid collision
with matter in the universe. Matter would perhaps reflect the signal of
this E-plain like sonar reflects sound waves and sensors could detect it
far in advance and prevent a spacecraft from disaster. Such a device could
use several of these star-drive engines to slow speed and navigate between
planets and stars.
By riding energy maps and using the power of attraction rather than propulsion
we could enter the 21st century as the first generation to prove time travel
is more than science fiction. It is now science fact that the magnetics
of gravity and energy in the E-plain allows. Black holes would most likely
reflect this electromagnetic field into the universe (at 3 degrees K).
If we used the frequency of the pulsar to hear it's signal with radio telescopes
then perhaps we should look in the electromagnetic spectrum for other types
of dead stars. Our Earth is a giant magnet that the magnetic effects of
our sun pulls upon to keep us in it's orbit in the same way subatomic protons,
electrons, and other particles are holding matter together with negitive
and positive charges.
Magnetics gave use electric and light and taught us to move electrons through
wires. Lasers have shown us how to use light to hear sound. Now we should
see if gravity is pulling light into a Black Hole because within it magnetics
and gravity are unified. The result must be the speed of light in my view.
Any matter, wave, or particle traveling at the speed of light must appear
as light to the stationary body. Since the gravity of a black hole warps
light into it, then it only stands to reason that to harness it's attraction
qualities would create a craft that could travel at the speed of light.
The E-plain must some how unify the forces of gravity and magnetism somehow
to do this. Perhaps the E-plain is only using gravity to attract matter
and magnetism to move matter farther apart leaving an ever expanding universe
constantly moving energy from one edge to the next.
The question of life arises in this model. The principles that are generally
accepted must meet Feynman's proposal, Euclidean space-time calculation,
and Einstein's curved space-time where particles try to follow the straight
path in curved space and appear bent over histories of the universe. Finally
this principle must explain life it self and how it formed on a subatomic
level. With this cone shaped growth of the universe we would meet the test.
The universe is in a clockwise rotation at the point of creation with this
model. The growth becomes a spiral as reflected in DNA strings and it's
clockwise spiral. No left-handed DNA would appear in this universe. The
particle would appear to be bent due to the expansion causing it's path
to form a spiral. The universe could then be a sphere shape of finite size
much like a scope of ice cream at the end of a sugarcone. Our ice-cream
here would be growing with expansion and the rotation of the ice-cream
would throw off the background radiation that we see at a certain phase
and 3 degrees Calvin. The spiral of the E- plain would then be pushing
against the universe and forcing it up and out in all directions. Space-time
is being created in all directions.
Time in our universe is then forced into one direction while the time in
the E-plain is forced in the opposite direction. Much like a whirlpool
the energy is going in a circle that forces buoyant matter away form the
center of the vortex. Since energy is converted back into the universe
there is no need for the temperature to cool with expansion. Particles
in space would reflect that background radiation at it's reflected temperature
at which expansion is maintained. As with Einstein's theory we have a constant
of energy and matter in balance of the universe in expansion and the E-plain
of Black Holes energy moving with it into an infinite motion. The spiral
will never crunch in this model. To do that it would have to meet a brick
wall of anti- matter an become non-existent. Anti-matter can only exist
in the E-plain at the point of creation and would then decrease to a constant
of matter heavy enough to continue the spiral motion of the universe or
universes it forces into expansion. God can then place it all in motion
and then stand back and watch it grow. Genes and there model as we now
can view it under an electron microscope would reflect that spiral, and
they do. Particles would also spin in balance with the force of the E-plain
or the clockwise direction of the known universe. Anti-matter proves this.
If we can reverse the spin and see anti-matter in a particle accelerator,
then it must be in the frame of quantum mechanics somewhere. This is the
E-plain's tool in the first moment of creation to create the gravity and
motion needed to begin the spiral. After the anti-matter has completed
it's attraction force needed to form hydrogen and the mass of matter then
it, would decrease and the stars would take over to form the energy needed
to continue expansion. Is this not what we see in the cosmology we know?
So we can see a universe or universes pushed into infinite expansion and
propelled into space and time by the direction of attraction first by anti-matter,
then by supernova stars. If the big bang was so hot as we read then anti-matter
would be replaced by the effect of stars in a very brief moment. Black
Holes would soon after come into being when the matter had sufficient space
to maintain gravity and the spin of the universe. Inertia would force out
as the E-plain would push in at the base of the vortex and expansion would
be procreated by the stars and the Black Holes that come from them. For
every force there is and equal and opposite force. That force can be seen
in the stars and the infinite expansion of space and time. Matter and energy
in this universe must be maintained constant for this to work. Space and
time must be unlimited to keep it in motion. Thus we have an E-plain of
antimatter in the first moments of creation and then a balance of it's
properties in the eventual force of it's existence.
The E-plain would then have an E-gravity, E-time or God-time (Quantum time),
E-space, and E-matter which is anti-matter that is replaced with super-dense
matter. It will also have E-energy directed at the universe where light
could not escape. It's field of energy must pull everything including light
in order to work. To maintain the constant it must also reflect it's energy
into new stars and matter to continue expansion and adjust for increased
size. And since there is no new quantity of matter and energy, it's work
would never have to push or move more matter than it balanced to push after
stars came into being. It would and does only effect matter in the event
horizon of the Black Hole stretching it into a gravity of quantum
magnitude to attract the matter and cause space to expand. It is much
like being in a balloon at it's exterior surface, filling it with air,
and moving yourself further away form the center with the more air you
fill it with. Space and time is the air that the E-plain expands and matter
would be the substance of the surface of the balloon which remains the
same quantity but moves with the expansion.
As for the mathematics of this equation it is beyond me. I have tried to
present
my theory in a way that will help some other physics math whiz to achieve
answers to those calculations. I think of this universe and the effect
of a Black Hole as a piece of matter on the surface of space, so heavy
that it pulls space and time in all directions and drawing matter and energy
along with it from a distance. This super- heavy piece of matter which
was once a star will not stop it's fall until it falls back to the point
of creation or hit's an anti-matter universe in a parallel dimension and
disappears. It may also collide with another Black hole in another universes
E-plain that is shared and explode reflecting it's energy back at the universes.
The only other possibility is that it never stops its fall and the universe
expands forever by the attraction and forces of the E-plain or the Black
Hole itself. To me it seems that things that occur here on Earth reflect
what happens in cosmology, as with hurricanes and anti-cyclones, South
and North poles, and magnets. So it is conceivable to me that an anti-matter
universe may exist. If this is so it would demand that there be some force
and quantum machine to keep it separate from the matter universe. The two
would have to have been created at the same time and their spin would effect
each other to force them apart. The forces between these universes must
have an energy exchange point much like that of two children on a school
yard pushing each other and falling away from the center of their force.
With this model a singularity and a quantum can coexist together and so
can God who pushed it all into motion in the beginning. Life can also exist
in another universe but it would be as unique as we are and follow the
same laws of physics that Einstein predicted. For that life to reach another
universe it would have to travel at the speed of light in the E-plain and
have control over navigation to place it at the exact time and place of
space-time desired to arrive at the matter (planet) of it's destination.
If warp 2 or 3 is possible ( 2 or 3 times the speed of light) then this
could only occur in the E-plain or by harnessing the force of attraction
of the E-plain. This idea suggests that in order to travel through dimensions
one must have control over time and be able to warp time. Such a device
must use the laws of physics to do that task at hand. Relativity tends
to lean in this direction of thinking with this model and the picture we
view is one that might explain why biology maintains age at a specific
gravity. That is to say, that if we lived on Pluto would we age 247 years
or one year. Clock experiments have proven that time is relative, but is
biology? If it is relative in the same relation as theory seems to allow,
then the universe is all the more grand and may be traveled by escaping
the bounds of the direction of time we travel. Thereby we can with more
ease overcome the vastness of space. After all it really does not matter
at which time in history past we arrive at another planet, only that we
arrive some time after the big bang. It is safe to assume though that any
life form arriving at another planets timeline would become a part of their
history.
Such an act of just going there through time would be an act of cosmic
violence against the biology of that dimension. To risk the natural progression
of history and science would be a crime. Even more so to risk the progress
of biology would also be a momentous crime that could have destructive
results. Just because we can travel through time does not mean we should.
Perhaps that is why we have trouble seeing UFO's and documenting there
existence on a mass media scale. We are perhaps visiting ourselves from
the future and doing all we can to keep from upsetting the time line with
a paradox. To do that we must hide ourselves well form our past to travel
there. The prime directive of Start Treck becomes a very important idea
that it's creators gave us as a legacy to science, that we not change the
progression of events past and alter the future. Not on Earth or on another
planet in our universe or some other universe. To do such might be effect
enough to place the fabric of existence into jeopardy.
We have looked at the brief moment of creation by seeing it's effect on
the present from our point of view in space time. Einstein was proven right
again and we attempted to unify the forces that cause the universe to come
into being. In a way we have looked at creation as an ongoing process that
is still expanding into eternity. We have also given a possible explanation
on why God exists. Even with a multi-universe model we still need to know
what the force was at the moment of creation. All information seems to
point to an infinite force with an equal amount of power and strength to
push an infinite expansion. The E-plain within this vast infinity must
also be a spiral of time as our expansion is. The sphere shape of the universe
is expanding in all directions and rotating around the center of force
in the E-plain. Behind the quantum machine is it's maker, the hand of God.
Einstein found that matter and energy were related. He also found that
time and space were related. I have tried to show, with my limited understanding
of math and formulas, that the time of matter and spcacetime are related.
That the energy of magnetics and gravity are related. That the age of the
universe is not the sum total of all it's pieces of matter. That matter-time
is warped by energy in the universe. I tried to show how science in this
field has made errors in trying to date matter by energy and size. And
doing that is like adding up my age by adding the total age of the energy
of each atom in my body. That would most likely put me at the age of a
trillion years old. The general theory I have presented here is that the
growth of the universe is like a cone with Black Holes pulling it into
expansion by an energy field that is reflected in the universe and it's
matter. Space tells matter how to move and matter tells space how to warp.
Energy tells matter how to reflect time and matter tells energy how to
expand time. Matter rotates in one direction and anti-matter rotates in
the opposit direction. To travel back in time the field energy of anti-matter
must be used to attract us in the opposit direction of time and matter.
To travel at the speed of light we must ride the unseen force in the universe
I call the E-plain, and use it's attraction to pull us at 186,000,000 miles
per second. And as matter warps space into expansion, it reflects the eternal
power behind the universe. That power is Yah Veh God.
" By Messiah All Things Consist" The Holy Bible
The Hand Of God In The Time Traveler's Universe; Copyright 1997 Daniel
W. Merrick, Eternal Light & Power Co. Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Bibliography: Bartusiak, Marcia, Thursday's Universe (1988); Davies, Paul,
The Cosmic Blueprint (1988); Ferris, Timothy, Coming of Age in the Milky
Way (1988); Greenstein, George, The Symbiotic Universe (1988); Harrison,
Edward, Darkness at Night (1987); Hawking, Stephen W., A Brief History
of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes (1988); Judson, H. F., The Search
for Solutions (1987); Linde, A. D., Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology
(1990); Mallove, E. F., The Quickening Universe (1987); Overbye, Dennis,
Lonely Hearts of the Cosmos: The Scientific Quest for the Secret of the
Universe (1991); Parker, Barry, Creation (1988); Silk, Joseph, The Big
Bang (1989); Trefil, James, The Dark Side of the Universe (1988); Abell,
G. O., Realm of the Universe (1984); Ferris, T., Coming of Age in the Milky
Way (1988); Field, G. B., and Chaisson, E. J., The Invisible Universe (1985);
Fredrick, L. W., and Baker, R. H., An Introduction to Astronomy, 9th ed.
(1981); Harwit, Martin, Cosmic Discovery (1984); Illingworth, Valerie,
The Macmillan Dictionary of Astronomy, 2d ed. (1985); Jastrow, Robert,
and Thompson, Malcolm R., Astronomy: Fundamentals and Frontiers, 4th ed.
(1984); Lovell, Sir Bernard, and Smith, Sir F. Graham, The Guide to Modern
Astronomy (1987); Mitton, Jacqueline, Key Definitions in Astronomy (1982);
Pasachoff, Jay M., Astronomy, 2d ed. (1983); Preston, R., First Light (1988);
Schaaf, F., The Starry Room (1988); Riordan, Michael, and Schramm, David
N., The Shadows of Creation: Dark Matter and the Structure of the Universe
(1991); Trefil, J. S., The Moment of Creation (1983); Unsold, Albrecht,
and Baschek, R. B., The New Cosmos, 3d ed. (1983); Zeilik, Michael, Astronomy:
The Evolving Universe, 4th ed. (1985); Friedlander, M. W., Astronomy (1985);
Gribbin, John, In Search of the Big Bang (1986); Wilkinson, D. T., "Anisotropy
of the Cosmic Blackbody Radiation," Science, June 20, 1986; Albert Einstein,
"Relativity The Special And The General Theory"(1961); Hugh Ross, "The
Fingerprint of God" (1991); Beyond 2000, The Discovery Channel, (Feb.1997).